Share FutureWorld MindBullets RSS feed Follow FutureWorld on Facebook
 
Dividing line
Return to List    << Previous    Random    Next >>    Share    5 Comments
Dividing line
 
MindBullets
COLD FUSION SIGNALS THE END OF BIG OIL AND NUCLEAR POWER
It’s the start of a new low energy nuclear revolution
Dateline: 5 June 2014
Every once in a while we see the introduction of a technology that is so radically innovative that it seems magical, or impossible. The old clichés get trotted out: "If it sounds too good to be true, it usually is!" and: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indiscernible from magic!"
'Cold' fusion has been deemed impossible for decades, but now is proving its detractors wrong. Andrea Rossi's persistence has paid off, and his energy catalyser is astounding the world with its ability to generate sustained energy from tiny quantities of metal powder.
In essence, there's no magic. Hydrogen gas and nickel nano particles are sealed in a metal cylinder and heated. When the fusion reaction is induced, the nickel converts to copper and heat is released. The trick is to get this to work at relatively low temperatures, and produce more energy than you've put in.
Rossi has devised a secret catalyst which does just that. At a 'cool' 300C his catalyser produces five times the energy required to sustain the reaction, from mere grams of fuel. And because the nuclear reaction is low-energy, there's no radiation or radioactive waste. The by-product is a small amount of copper.
Despite the fact that Rossi's prototypes have been verified by several scientific studies, allegations of trickery and fraud continue. The implications of energy from a safe low-temperature fusion reactor are enormous. Traditional nuclear power plants become obsolete at a stroke. The fossil fuel industries will topple like dominoes. Vested interests rightly fear the greatest disruption to the energy scene in history.
But for others, who see this as a beautiful Black Swan, and a boon for humanity, the only questions are: "Does it really work?" and: "Is the secret catalyst affordable at commercial scale?" If the answers are yes, the world will never be the same again.
Published 13 June 2013
Hazardous Thinking At Work
Despite appearances to the contrary, FutureWorld cannot and does not predict the future. Our MindBullets scenarios are fictitious and designed purely to explore possible futures, challenge and stimulate strategic thinking. Use these at your own risk. Any reference to actual people, entities or events is entirely allegorical. Copyright FutureWorld International Limited. Reproduction or distribution permitted only with recognition of Copyright and the inclusion of this disclaimer. Public domain image.
ANALYSIS >> SYNTHESIS: How this scenario came to be


Nuclear Fusion

Nuclear fusion occurs when the nuclei of two light atoms combine to form a heavier atom, releasing large amounts of energy in the process. Fusion is the source of energy in active stars, including our sun, where massive amounts of hydrogen fuse to become helium and release radiation throughout the solar system. Fusion is one of the nuclear reactions harnessed by humans to create powerful weapons, in the form of the hydrogen bomb.

Nuclear fission, on the other hand, is the process of splitting an atom, releasing high energy particles, which go on to split more atoms in a chain reaction, using radioactive heavy materials like uranium. Fission produces less external energy than fusion, but is easier to initiate and control. All nuclear power plants currently in use are based on the uranium fission reaction.

Fusion reactors have successfully been built, using the tokamak design, where very high temperature plasma is contained in a magnetic torus. All the fusion reactors built to date have been experimental, and none has produced excess energy, as very high levels of power are required to ignite the plasma and maintain the electromagnetic bubble.

In 1989, two Utah electrochemists, Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann, announced that they had achieved cold fusion: fusion reactions which could occur at ‘normal’ temperatures. However, they made their announcements before any peer review of their work was performed, and no subsequent experiments by other researchers revealed any evidence of fusion.

Some researchers have continued to make experiments attempting to produce cold fusion, and have largely adopted the term Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR) to avoid the negative connotations associated with cold fusion. None have reported verified success. Until now, that is.

1952: Hydrogen bomb

The first detonation of a hydrogen bomb, code named Ivy Mike, yields 10.4 megatons out of a fusion fuel of liquid deuterium.

1968: Tokamak

Results from the tokamak, a Soviet magnetic confinement device, which Igor Tamm and Andrei Sakharov had been working on, show the temperatures in their machine to be over an order of magnitude higher than what was expected by the rest of the fusion community.

1989: Cold fusion?

Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann announce that they have achieved cold fusion. This is never verified.

1997: JET success

The JET tokamak in the UK produces 16 MW of fusion power - the current world record for fusion power.

2001: NIF begins

Building construction for the immense 192-beam 500-terawatt National Ignition Facility (NIF) project in the US is completed and construction of laser beam-lines and target bay diagnostics commences.

2005: ITER

Following final negotiations between the EU and Japan, ITER (International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor) chooses France for the site of the largest tokamak reactor. Construction is expected to take at least a decade.

2009: NIF complete

Construction of the NIF at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is reported as complete.

2011: E-Cat

Inventor Andrea Rossi together with researcher Sergio Focardi from the University of Bologna claim to have successfully demonstrated commercially viable cold fusion in a device called an Energy Catalyzer.

2012: E-Cat HT

The NIF performs several experiments with all 192 laser beams at full power, generating a pulse of 356 TW peak power. The construction of ITER is delayed, with completion expected only in 2018, or later.

Andrea Rossi submits his prototype E-Cat HT for testing in December. Despite some procedural problems, the results are positive, and verified by two other scientists.

2013: E-Cat HT2

In March the E Cat-HT2, an improved design, is tested for excess heat production by a team of seven scientists. In May they publish their paper, reporting on both test experiments, and conclude that the device produces excess heat (over and above the input energy) that is at least one order of magnitude greater than conventional sources.

In July they begin a long term test experiment of the E-Cat over several months.

2014: Fusion Future

The scientists publish their report for peer review. The results are unequivocal. The E-Cat device, charged with hydrogen-loaded nickel and secret catalysts, produces sustained heat at over 300C of 2KW while drawing only 350W of intermittent electric power. They cannot determine if the process is nuclear fusion, as they are not permitted to inspect the contents of the fuel core, but are happy to conclude that the energy produced is “off the scale of conventional chemical sources.”

Dividing line
 
Comments Sign in or sign up to add a comment Return to List Back to top
Dividing line
Dividing line
Neil Jacobsohn   Cold fusion
One of FutureWorld's associates, energy economist Jeremy Wakeford, has just published this article in Engineering News on Rossi's progress. Read on!
http://www.engineeringnews.co.za/article/interest-in-lenr-device-resurges-as-independent-report-is-released-2013-06-07


Posted: 13 June 2013 at 08:44 Delete Reply to this comment
Dividing line
Doug Vining   Cold fusion takeover
This cold fusion device has been called dubious and unproven. But now a US venture capital company has acquired it with the aim of developing the technology and making it widely available.

Will it work? If it does, it will change everything.
A FuturesForum post (titled: "Cold fusion takeover") refers to this MindBullet. The full FuturesForum post can be read here: http://www.futureworld.org/PublicZone/FuturesForum/BlogDetails.aspx?PostID=055a1c54-bdd3-4bb1-8b69-02855a2c21ce


Posted: 5 February 2014 at 16:24 Delete Reply to this comment
Dividing line
Doug Vining   Fusion's future
This nuclear fusion startup isn't trying to recreate cold fusion experiments. Instead they think that their reactor engine can create hot fusion in one-second cycles, generating a net gain of electric current. The problem with fusion energy, it's always a decade away, even in a decade. I think cheap solar will beat fusion power in the next decade, but who knows?

"At the scale they’re designing for, the team thinks that it will have significant price advantages once they go to market. Their design collects charged particles with each pulse, meaning it can generate electricity without having to construct a pricey turbine in addition to the reactor. The reactor is fueled by deuterium, an isotope of hydrogen that is abundant in sea water, making it more affordable than truckloads of diesel."
A FuturesForum post (titled: "Fusion's future") refers to this MindBullet. The full FuturesForum post can be read here: http://www.futureworld.org/PublicZone/FuturesForum/BlogDetails.aspx?PostID=329f669e-8ad5-47cb-920f-84dacefd9de9


Posted: 15 August 2014 at 10:13 Delete Reply to this comment
Dividing line
Doug Vining   Portable nuclear power
No this invention is not cold fusion, or even warm fusion. Rather it is a nuclear power cell, described as a water-based battery. Perhaps it should be called a fuel cell, as the radioactive material presumably gets used up. It's also unclear whether this device can be recharged and discharged, or if it's a one-time use. My guess is that it would be fairly expensive to use in place of a rechargeable lithium battery in a car, but for specialised applications could prove superior.
A FuturesForum post (titled: "Portable nuclear power") refers to this MindBullet. The full FuturesForum post can be read here: http://www.futureworld.org/PublicZone/FuturesForum/BlogDetails.aspx?PostID=3b12497d-379e-4e2d-aedc-803d8ae64b7b


Posted: 17 September 2014 at 13:26 Delete Reply to this comment
Dividing line
Neil Jacobsohn   Nuclear fusion a reality?
We've written a lot on these pages over the years about the dream of nuclear fusion - clean, fast nuclear energy. Could it actually be happening? The sceptics remain, but it seems unlikely that a company of the stature of Lockheed Martin would make lose claims. The energy market just got more exciting!
A FuturesForum post (titled: "Nuclear fusion a reality?") refers to this MindBullet. The full FuturesForum post can be read here: http://www.futureworld.org/PublicZone/FuturesForum/BlogDetails.aspx?PostID=88cf14ff-3241-41fc-bcfd-b67531029661


Posted: 30 October 2014 at 12:02 Delete Reply to this comment
Dividing line
Comments by users of MindBullets are those of the authors and are not necessarily shared, endorsed and/or warranted by FutureWorld. All MindBullet content is Copyright FutureWorld International © 2017. All Rights Reserved.